- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:20:13 +0100
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Le 11/11/2012 22:14, L. David Baron a écrit : > So, if we have: > > @page { > margin-left: 10vw; > } > > should: > (1) the user-agent try to solve the relevant equations to find a > valid size for the page box given the margins? (This seems like > it might be doable in a few of the simple cases, but certainly > isn't solvable in general.) > > (2) the declaration be ignored? > > (3) the declaration be treated as some other particular value > (e.g., '0', 'auto')? A concrete proposal for 2: Viewport units (vw/vh/vmin/vmax) are not allowed in the following properties: - size - margin-* - border-*-width - padding-* - width - height when used directly inside @page. (They are allowed in page-margin boxes or future at-rules inside @page.) If used anyway, the declaration is invalid and ignored with the usual cascading rules. This covers the most obvious cases, but is not enough. Consider: @page { font-size: 1vw; width: 50em } This one can be fixed by adding font-size to the list of properties above, or adding font-based units to the list of forbidden units. Also, the page context inherits from the root element: :root { width: 50vw } @page { width: inherit } :root { width: auto; margin: 10vw } @page { width: inherit } :root { font-size: 1vw } @page { width: 50em } I don’t know what to do about these, short of having the page context *not* inherit from anything. Ideas? -- Simon Sapin
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2012 13:20:41 UTC