- From: Tim Leverett <zzzzbov@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:13:16 -0500
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2012 13:14:15 UTC
>Would it make sense to extend the border-radius property (and its longhands) to accept the 'none' keyword that would compute to the same as '0' ? I don't think this makes sense any more than it would be to add `none` as a possible value for margin, padding, width, height, and any other property that takes numeric values. ☺ On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > A designer colleague just wrote `border-radius: none` (to override a less > specific declaration) and wasted some time trying to "make it work" before > figuring out that they needed `border-radius: 0`. > > Would it make sense to extend the border-radius property (and its > longhands) to accept the 'none' keyword that would compute to the same as > '0' ? > > Cheers, > -- > Simon Sapin > >
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2012 13:14:15 UTC