W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2012

Re: [css3-conditional] restructured forward-compatibility aspects of @supports grammar

From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 08:37:49 +0100
Message-ID: <50A34A4D.8080200@kozea.fr>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
CC: www-style@w3.org
Le 14/11/2012 01:39, L. David Baron a écrit :
> It doesn't say that anything matching general_enclosed is invalid;
> it says that things that don't match the grammar are invalid.

You’re right of course. I shouldn’t do review specs at such hours, sorry :)

> I can probably make this clearer by adding:
>    (i.e., one that does not match this loose grammar which includes
>    the general_enclosed production)
> between "grammar above" and "is invalid".

Reading carefully now I think the current text is good enough, although 
this addition could not hurt.

Simon Sapin
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2012 07:38:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:21 UTC