- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 01:20:15 +0100
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Le 14/11/2012 00:25, L. David Baron a écrit : > (I believe publication was waiting on me to review these edits; I've > now done so, but others should now review the edits I've made.) Hi, The current ED has this paragraph: > The above grammar is purposely very loose for forwards-compatibility > reasons, since the general_enclosed production allows for substantial > future extensibility. Any ‘@supports’ rule that does not parse > according to the grammar above is invalid. Style sheets must not use > such a rule and processors must ignore such a rule (including all of > its contents). The last statement (anything matching general_enclosed is invalid) seems to be in contradiction with the later statement that general_enclosed evaluates to false. Cheers, -- Simon Sapin
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2012 00:20:44 UTC