- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:49:48 -0800
- To: Philippe Verdy <verdy_p@wanadoo.fr>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Philippe Verdy <verdy_p@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > 2012/11/13 Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> >> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Philippe Verdy <verdy_p@wanadoo.fr> wrote: >> > 2012/11/9 Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>: >> >> I suggest sending this feedback to the Media Fragments WG, then. I'd >> >> prefer not to add an explicit fragment syntax to CSS unless/until we >> >> determine that MF is broken and won't be fixed in a reasonable >> >> timeframe. >> > >> > The CSS WG is concerned only because it makes a direct reference to >> > the MF just because of the presence of a fragment identifier, without >> > even knowing if that URL is referencing a media and where to locate >> > it. >> >> This feedback is still appropriate for Media Fragment WG, not us. > > Visibly you did not read and understood anything. Sorry, bro, but you're wrong. I perfectly understand what you're saying, and also understand that I don't want to take it as CSS's responsibility unless it proves necessary. Right now, your comments should be directed at the Media Fragments WG. Unless you have something new, I'm done with this thread. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:50:36 UTC