- From: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
- Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:34:25 +0000
- To: www-style@w3.org
- CC: florianr@opera.com
On 08/11/12 15:09, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen wrote: > Hi there, > > I think it makes sense having both. CSS is about presentation and I > believe that orientation is part of that, where as the lockOrientation > is a way to set the orientation as a result of a user action (which > probably should be restricted if the orientation is set via CSS). > > Setting orientation via CSS works well together with media queries. For > instance you can make a layout of a online magazine that works in > landscape and portrait, but the landscape mode might not work well on > sizes less than the size of a 8" tablet so for those you set orientation > to portrait only. The issue is that I doubt any UA will allow any random web page to force the orientation without a user interaction, especially if the browser isn't fullscreen. I'm not aware of a declarative way to go fullscreen yet so it might make this feature not implemented by most UA. But again, I will not fight to have it removed, I just doubt that we (Mozilla) will implement that any time soon and likely never if the context stays the same. > I don't mind adding support for portrait-primary, etc, but if we add > that they should be supported by the (orientation: *) media features as > well. Florian, do you think we could add those to CSS Media Queries orientation values? -- Mounir
Received on Sunday, 11 November 2012 17:34:55 UTC