+1 I ran into this too with the new resposive image techniques that are doing the rounds. The initial keyword doesn't seem to cover this either, though I may be wrong. On 8 November 2012 05:15, Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>wrote: > Consider this markup > > <body id=main> > ... > <div id=editor contenteditable> > <table width=700 >...</table> > </div> > > </body> > > And in styles declared somewhere for the page there is such rule: > > #main table { width:100%; } > > that obviously applies to the #editor>table element and > that ruins the design of content inside #editor. > > So there is a need for something like > > #editor>table { width: <use-default-handling>; } > > But I simply don't know what to put there. width:auto has different meaning > for the table and other elements like img, textarea, etc. > > Disclaimer: I do know that @width and the like are deprecated but that > is about editing real documents from the web wilderness. > > It should be something to achieve this, no? > > -- > Andrew Fedoniouk. > > http://terrainformatica.com > > -- Pete Boere Web DeveloperReceived on Thursday, 8 November 2012 10:09:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:23 UTC