- From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:02:49 +0800
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- CC: WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
Thanks! That would make it a lot clearer. I am going to be a bit more picky however.. (12/11/07 11:29), Alan Stearns wrote: > Yes, the spec should say something about this. There's some text in > css4-pseudo [1] that's meant to describe this change: > > --- > A CSS rule using ::before or ::after creates a pseudo-element > only if the computed values of the Œcontent¹ property > and the Œflow-from¹ property [CSS3-REGIONS] are not both Œnone¹. > --- > Block container pseudo-elements where the value of ¹flow-from' > computes to an <ident> and the value of Œcontent¹ computes to > Œnone¹ are generated as CSS Regions, which is an update to the > behavior described in [CSS21]. > --- These two sentences give me two different results for a case like: span::before { display: inline; flow-from: test; counter-reset: x 10; } span::after { content: counter(x); } The former suggests "10" and the latter suggests "0". Also, what should happen for a case like span::before { display: inline; flow-from: test; flow-into: test; counter-reset: x 10; } span::after { content: counter(x); } Again the former suggests "10" and I can't really tell what the latter is suggesting. No opinion whatsoever to which is right. Cheers, Kenny -- Web Specialist, Oupeng Browser, Beijing Try Oupeng: http://www.oupeng.com/
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 04:03:23 UTC