- From: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 17:51:30 +0200
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
> The very idea of mixing up a function with a name ('define') is > completely confusing. +1, BTW. > To me the discussion about how CSS variables look like > syntactically is out of the scope of this thread. There are other > threads related to that. Indeed, I would like this thread to be closed given that an agreement has been reached on his initial subject (the philosophy behind the [css-variables] proposal), and that the ongoing discussion seems to have shifted again to the variable syntax. The final syntax will be subject to vote in a future CSS WG telcon and Tab already collected enough feedback and proposals to craft a good optionset to present to the WG members (no-op, $foo, x-foo, ...) with pros and cons. As multiple WG members followed the CSS variable threads, I don't think we have to worry about repeating our arguments anymore. That being said, if there are still people having remarks about the syntax (nothing wrong with it), I would like to ask them to do so in another, more appropriate thread. Thanks a lot, François
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2012 15:52:01 UTC