- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 08:32:24 -0700
- To: Divya Manian <manian@adobe.com>
- Cc: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Divya Manian <manian@adobe.com> wrote: > On 5/30/12 7:04 PM, "Sylvain Galineau" <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote: >>Not to prove that everyone's preference is someone else's ugly but I can't >>stand the x-convention. If we're going to have a prefix why not make it >>something >>readable. For instance: >> >> :root { define-link-color: blue } >> a { color: $link-color } >> >>...is imo a reasonable balance: terse at the point of use and very >>explicit at >>the point of declaration since there should be many of the former for >>each of >>the latter. > > We cant have two different 'prefix'es. It is just one to refer to a > variable. The very idea of mixing up a function with a name('define') is > completely confusing. I've come to strongly agree with you. I'm in the middle of a rewrite to accommodate some of the changes I'd suggested, like $foo for using a var, and when I'm changing an example I have to *fight* to keep myself from saying "color: $var-main-color;". ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2012 15:33:19 UTC