- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 20:50:50 +0000
- To: Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com <mtanalin@yandex.ru>
- CC: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com [mailto:mtanalin@yandex.ru] > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 1:27 PM > To: Sylvain Galineau > Cc: Tab Atkins Jr.; Daniel Glazman; www-style@w3.org > Subject: Re: [css-variables] status ? > > Unfortunately, using preprocessors is not always possible. For example, on > Windows/IIS platform with a custom CGI executable without ability to use > any script language, it's completely not an option. Also, using > preprocessor does not provide ability to make CSS more compact (using Gzip > not always possible, and is problematic under IIS6 and lower in > particular). This is off-topic. Compressing stylesheets when gzip is not available or compensating for the peculiarities of a given HTTP stack is out of scope. > > Moreover, there is nothing _bad_ in having preprocessor features available > natively. Using preprocessor for feature that can be easily and reasonably > implemented natively would be unneeded overhead. > This is off-topic. Local 'preprocessing' is out of scope.
Received on Friday, 25 May 2012 20:51:23 UTC