- From: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 20:07:53 +0200
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Tab Atkins Jr.: > The feedback has pretty much all been negative about the name, though. Of course, all the reciprocal length units are plain stupid and unnecessary – and always have been. image-resolution: <count> [ / <length> ]?; image-resolution: 1dot; /* with 1px default */ image-resolution: 300dot/1in; image-resolution: 100dot / 1mm; dot-density: <number> / <length>; dot-density: 1/1px; dot-density: 50 / 1pc; dot-density: 1000/ 1cm; image-resolution: <reciprocal-length>; image-resolution: calc(1dot/1px); image-resolution: calc(300dot/1in); image-resolution: calc(100dot/1mm); dot-density: <reciprocal-length>; dot-density: calc(1/1px); dot-density: calc(50/1pc); dot-density: calc(1000/1cm); image-dot: <length>; image-dot: 1px; /* = */ image-dot-width: 1px; image-dot-height: 1px; image-dot: 0.24pt; image-dot: 10um; would all have been better solutions than what we have now and ‘x’ wouldn’t change any of that. Yes, I should stop ranting about the same things again and again.
Received on Friday, 25 May 2012 18:08:25 UTC