- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 08:17:03 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 5/16/12 8:42 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> <fieldset> is display:block already, so it's not troublesome. > > Hmm. I guess that's OK; if someone styles it as display:inline they're > asking for the non-default handling. Right. We're solely trying to handle the things that may be either inline or atomic-inline based on used-value-time data. For consistency, we're handling some that are always atomic inlines, like <input>. >> Is<progress> (and<meter>) ever a replaced element? > > It certainly is in Gecko. > > And I don't see how it wouldn't be per spec. Given > > <progress>Some text</progress> > > in a browser supporting <progress>, is the "Some text" rendered? If not, > it's clearly a replaced element. > > I would assume <meter> is the same; I missed that one because it wasn't in > the code I was looking at. ;) Good point. I'll put it on the list. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2012 15:17:57 UTC