- From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 17:06:47 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, 15 May 2012 16:30:26 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/page.html#page-breaks >> [2] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-multicol/#column-breaks >> [3] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-break/#break-properties >> [4] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-regions/#region-flow-break > > I honestly have no idea what the Media line does anyway; I suspect > that, like the Applies To line, it's just a bit of advisory > information about where the property is expected to be used. It is non-normative: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/about.html#media-applies > Anyway, assuming that "visual" doesn't exclude "paged", the break > properties should be "visual". Something "visual" can be "paged" and/or "continuous": http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/media.html#media-groups It seems strange/wrong to me that Fragmentation and Regions duplicate the break-* property definitions. (Multicol doesn't seem to be a duplicate of CSS 2.1 since the properties have different names.) -- Øyvind Stenhaug Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 15:07:23 UTC