- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 09:13:52 +0200
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Le 11/05/2012 22:21, Simon Fraser a écrit : > This has been argued before > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Feb/0131.html> > and I'm still very much in favor of having overflow create stacking > context. I've spent many hundreds of developer hours on making > overflow work correctly with accelerated compositing in WebKit, and > much of that time could have been saved if overflow simply created a > stacking context. I asked for the same reason. I would very much like to avoid spending many [insert multiplier] hours implementing overflow correctly (per the current spec, without a stacking context) ... at all. I guess that WeasyPrint will stay non-conforming for the time being. The cost of implementing overflow without it creating a new stacking context is much higher for us that the interop concerns. (Although we still have bigger interop concerns, like implementing floats ;)) -- Simon Sapin
Received on Saturday, 12 May 2012 07:14:25 UTC