- From: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 14:09:28 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Hi Tab, On 04/30/2012 03:51 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> # Computed Value: >> # ‘auto’ computes to parent's ‘flex-align’; otherwise >> # as specified >> # [...] >> # A value of ‘auto’ for ‘flex-item-align’ computes to >> # the value of ‘flex-align’ on the flexbox item's flexbox. >> >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#flex-item-align >> >> I see two ways to handle this situation: >> (a) if there's no parent, 'auto' computes to 'stretch' >> (the default flex-align value) [...] > > Whoops, silly mistake. It should definitely be (a). I'll make the > change shortly - fantasai and I are hip-deep in the Pagination section > right now. I just wanted to follow up on this -- I don't think this change has made it into the spec yet. Also: The two chunks of spec that I quoted above are a bit contradictory. The former "Computed Value" chunk just refers to the "parent" & is non-flexbox-specific, whereas the prose below it refers to the "flexbox item's flexbox" & leaves it undefined what "auto" would compute to in non-flexbox contexts. I strongly prefer the more general language in the "Computed Value" chunk, rather than the flexbox-specific prose. Thanks! ~Daniel
Received on Friday, 11 May 2012 21:09:58 UTC