- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 08:27:00 +0200
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Cc: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>, WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote: > Ok, I understand the issues. Numerical comparison is especially bad for > non-zero values that are rounded to zero because of machine precision. > > So if the constraint is syntactical, css3-syntax is the place to have it. > The "new" state-machine-based css3-syntax already has an "integer" flag on > numerical tokens. Adding "positive" and "zero" flags should be enough to > define <positive-integer> and other variants. > > Can V&U3 depend on Syntax3, or will the later not be ready in time? It's tight, but probably not. We intend to resolve to advance V&U3 to CR this week, and Syntax won't be ready to go to WD for a bit. However, we can define it in hand-wavey terms for now with an informative reference to Syntax, and then update the reference once Syntax goes WD. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 06:28:07 UTC