W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Proposition to change the prefixing policy

From: Rik <coolcat_the_best@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 19:18:25 +0200
Message-ID: <SNT132-ds5B89A5500610ACCAA0208CF130@phx.gbl>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: <www-style@w3.org>, "Florian Rivoal" <florianr@opera.com>
Well, isn't that just one other problem solved with this way of prefixing? 
This way browsers CAN move on to newer versions, even after it gets 
sufficient usage.


-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- 
From: Tab Atkins Jr.
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 2:57 PM
To: Rik
Cc: www-style@w3.org ; Florian Rivoal
Subject: Re: Proposition to change the prefixing policy

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Rik <coolcat_the_best@hotmail.com> wrote:
> There is one major difference. the prefixes we use now are changing their
> behaviour when the browsers update it to the newest spec, which will break
> older content.

No, browsers just dont' update their prefixed version anymore once it
gets sufficient usage.  That's why all the prefixed gradients are
frozen at whatever syntax they had initially. (Firefox has updated
theirs compatibly.)

Received on Monday, 7 May 2012 17:18:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:16 UTC