At the time Tantek wrote this up here http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/process From: Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com] Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2012 6:12 PM To: Tab Atkins Jr. Cc: Florian Rivoal; www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: Proposition to change the prefixing policy On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com<mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com>> wrote: Tantek's proposal, which he brought to the group late in the last Paris FtF, hits approximately the same sweet spot but with less ambiguity - it's nearly a mechanical process. As a reminder, his proposal is that, at the moment anyone can prove two interop implementations of a feature with a WG-approved testsuite, we cut that feature into an LC->CR draft. In effect, we have a constantly-moving ED, with snapshots of testably-interop features calved off as necessary. I think that Florian's proposal matches what a lot of us want to see, and that Tantek's proposal accomplishes Florian's goals with the least ambiguity (and thus greatest chance of success) of all the variants I've heard so far. We should adopt it. Given your summary of Tantek's proposal, I think I support it as well. However, I would like to see it in concrete form to be sure. Is it well documented at some link?
Received on Sunday, 6 May 2012 17:00:12 UTC