- From: Dirk Pranke <dpranke@chromium.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 11:42:01 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 5/4/12 2:33 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Alan Stearns<stearns@adobe.com> wrote: >>> >>> I do not think this would necessarily be the case. Experiments and >>> >>> browser-specific features could still be added with a vendor prefix only. >>> We could mandate that the unprefixed version (aliased to the prefixed >>> version) could only come after the appropriate standards body had a >>> proposal in hand and agreed to work on it. >> >> >> Isn't this essentially what the current process is supposed to be? > > > The current process has a much higher bar for unprefixing than "Working > group agreed to work on this spec". A bar that allows a draft to be worked > on for years with multiple nearly-interoperable implementations in the > market, before prefixes can start being removed. > Sorry, I totally missed that last clause :( Right, that's a big difference from CR. To be clear, though, this is still quite different from what Florian is proposing ... -- Dirk
Received on Friday, 4 May 2012 19:13:51 UTC