- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 14:37:01 -0400
- To: Dirk Pranke <dpranke@chromium.org>
- CC: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 5/4/12 2:33 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Alan Stearns<stearns@adobe.com> wrote: >> I do not think this would necessarily be the case. Experiments and >> browser-specific features could still be added with a vendor prefix only. >> We could mandate that the unprefixed version (aliased to the prefixed >> version) could only come after the appropriate standards body had a >> proposal in hand and agreed to work on it. > > Isn't this essentially what the current process is supposed to be? The current process has a much higher bar for unprefixing than "Working group agreed to work on this spec". A bar that allows a draft to be worked on for years with multiple nearly-interoperable implementations in the market, before prefixes can start being removed. -Boris
Received on Friday, 4 May 2012 18:54:39 UTC