Re: [css3-writing-modes] before/after terminology alternative?

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On May 2, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> We're pretty settled on start/end for the logical inline directions, but
> >> most people aren't that thrilled with before/after for the logical block
> >> directions. Someone suggested head/tail as an alternative. Would that be
> >> clearer? Do we want to switch?


i oppose changing, and would like to see before/after retained for
compatibility with existing W3C usage in other specs