- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:32:40 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 02/21/2012 02:53 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#the-background-repeat lists > the Computed Value of background-repeat as "as specified". > > Since the Computed Value line describes the information that the > implementation must retain (or not) in the computed value (which is > then inherited), this seems to imply that implementations must > retain the distinction between "repeat" and "repeat repeat" while > inheriting. This seems wrong; I don't think that distinction should > be retained in the conceptual computed value. > > (However, when serializing, since implementations should prefer > serializing a computed value to its longer-established form [1], > both should get serialized as "repeat".) > > At least, based on my understanding of what the "Computed Value" > line means, I think this should change. But I'm not sure how well > my understanding is reflected in the relevant specifications. Ok, I've changed it from Computed value: as specified to Computed value: two keywords, one per dimension And clarified that the one-keyword values compute to the two-keyword forms. Please let me know if this satisfies your comment. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2012 16:33:12 UTC