- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:09:59 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 3/22/12 2:04 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote: > I think this needs clarification in the flexbox spec. Maybe we need to > use the element hierarchy instead of the box hierarchy for determining > flexbox item eligibility? I'm not sure if that makes sense. The other option, if the behavior of the example is desired, is to explicitly include blocks that split a non-replaced inline in the "runs of inlines" case and explicitly exclude them from the "block child" case. -Boris
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2012 18:10:28 UTC