- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:19:13 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:49 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/#conventions (7.1, Document > Conventions) says that the RFC 2119 terms do not appear in > uppercase. However, there are two occurrences in uppercase that > should probably be fixed (which are particularly odd since a "must > not" later in the same paragraph is not uppercase): > > # User agents MAY accept ‘image-fit’ as an alias for ‘object-fit’, > # as a previous version of this specification used that name. > # Authors must not use ‘image-fit’ in their stylesheets. > > # User agents MAY accept ‘image-position’ as an alias for > # ‘object-position’, as a previous version of this specification > # used that name. Authors must not use ‘image-position’ in their > # stylesheets. Done. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2012 19:20:01 UTC