Re: [css3-values] 5.1 minor clarification changes

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Alan Stearns <> wrote:
> 1. The normative definition of the ch unit makes sure the zero glyph is not
> read as a capital 'O'. But the informative summary table in 5.1 does not.
> The table definition should have the same parenthetical aside as the
> normative definition:
>  "0" (ZERO, U+0030) glyph
> 2. I'm not entirely sure this is correct, and if correct it may not be
> necessary. But I think the exception of relative lengths used with the
> font-size property could be made more clear with these changes within the
> scope of 5.1.1:
>  s/the font metrics/the computed font metrics/  (2 changes)
>  s/font size inherited/computed font size inherited/  (1 change)

I agree with all these.  They're committed now.


Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2012 19:21:29 UTC