- From: Paul Bakaus <pbakaus@zynga.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:32:08 +0000
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Am 12.03.12 17:26 schrieb "Brad Kemper" unter <brad.kemper@gmail.com>: > >On Mar 12, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU> wrote: > >> On 3/12/12 10:43 AM, Brad Kemper wrote: >>> I think it should be automatic. The 'border' of 'border-radius' doesn't >>> mean that it only affects the border. It just means that the border box >>> is where you measure the radius. It also affects the radius of the >>> padding box and content box, and /should/ also affect the outline. >> >> But how, exactly? The outline need not be rectangular, while >>border-radius specifies curvature for precisely 4 corners. >> >> For the simple case of one single box for an element, the two can be >>treated interchangeably, of course. > >I'm primarily concerned with elements that the author set 'border-radius' >and 'outline' on, which should have precisely 4 corners, I think. Can you >give some examples of non-rectangular outlines, so that I know what you >are referring to? Do you mean outline on SVG? If I may chime in - he's referring to outlines triggered by a focus, for instance. These may include multiple elements. If you have a container with multiple nested elements, WebKit then tries to wrap the outline around the rectangles of the children I think. >
Received on Monday, 12 March 2012 16:32:42 UTC