- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 11:37:22 -0600
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 3/9/12 5:27 AM, Christoph Päper wrote: > … and I’m pretty sure there have been proposals already which would require that to be extended to > > ::?[A-z0-9-]+(\(.*\))? My point was that right now there are no real restrictions on the syntax of future pseudo-elements or pseudo-classes, and certainly not on prefixed ones. So having some sort of setup where "as little as possible" is dropped would involve defining restrictions on said future syntax so that UAs now know what they're supposed to drop. Make sense? -Boris
Received on Friday, 9 March 2012 17:38:00 UTC