- From: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 11:22:00 -0800
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2012 19:22:48 UTC
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Daniel Glazman < daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > Le 08/03/12 19:52, Erik Arvidsson a écrit : > >> Today we don't drop the whole rule for unknown tag names, attribute >> names etc. We should not drop rules for unknown pseudos either. >> > > > Well. There is no such thing as an unknown tag or attribute name, > that's the big difference. Tag and attribute names belong to the > document instance's space, the pseudos belong to the CSS parser's space. > > I don't think we should change our old and stable error handling rules > here. How do you propose that authors include vendor-prefixed pseudos in their stylesheets? What are the benefits of the current error handling that outweigh the cost of needing to completely duplicate code for each vendor? Ojan
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2012 19:22:48 UTC