- From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 04:27:09 +0000
- To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>, WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
Refer to section 3.1 ... http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/#layering I believe mental model was similar to what led to this... # If a property doesn't have enough comma-separated # values to match the number of layers For images, this will never be the case because background-image is what drives how many layers there are. I suspect that thinking spilled over into the section you quoted. I concur that the 3.10 should probably be improved. -----Original Message----- From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu [mailto:kennyluck@csail.mit.edu] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 5:47 PM To: WWW Style Subject: [css3-background] Editorial: background shorthand missing 'background-image' assignment? 3.10. Backgrounds Shorthand: the ‘background’ property # Given a valid declaration, for each layer the shorthand first sets # the corresponding layer of each of ‘background-position’, #‘background-size’, ‘background-repeat’, ‘background-origin’, #‘background-clip’ and ‘background-attachment’ to that property's # initial value, then assigns any explicit values specified for this # layer in the declaration. Unless I am missing something, 'background-image' is missing here...
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 04:27:46 UTC