- From: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 15:45:03 -0500
- To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
- Cc: "Public www-style mailing list" <www-style@w3.org>
Le Lun 5 mars 2012 17:47, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu a écrit : [snipped] > Currently tests in CSS2.1 related to negative border > width are all marked as invalid presumably because of this sloppy > sentence (am I right? From the system I couldn't find the reason why > they are marked invalid). Yes. Those tests in CSS2.1 test suite (with negative border width) are marked (and should be marked) invalid for that reason: negative border width are illegal values. http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#parsing-errors > > All browsers interoperably treat negative border-width as invalid. Opera > didn't have testing results for some of the border-top-width-* tests > that use negative width (i.e. 012, 023, 034, 056, 067, 078)[3], although > these tests all pass in Opera12alpha. These tests all pass in Opera 11.61 too. > > In summary, I suggest we just say > > | Negative values are not allowed. > > (I am for this change in CSS2.1 too) > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-box/ > [2] (the mail this mail replies to) > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0107 I actually agree with that www-style/2011Jan/0107 post. > [3] http://test.csswg.org/harness/results/CSS21_DEV/section/8.5.1/ Gérard -- CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011 http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html Contributions to CSS 2.1 test suite http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ Web authors' contributions to CSS 2.1 test suite http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 20:45:33 UTC