- From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:37:06 +0100
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 19:42:11 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com> >> And the part about transforms being "ignored when >> rendering the element as an image" should also apply when determining >> the >> d.b.b.? >> >> Not a nitpick this time, I'm not entirely sure how to interpret this >> part >> w.r.t. transforms. Nobody implements per spec yet? > > Yeah, the intent is that it's based on the box's geometry + border > image area (similar to how SVG's DBB is the geometry + stroke). > Children, even if they're transformed or positioned outside the box, > don't affect this calculation. > > Suggestions on better ways to state this? No good way comes to mind. Just moving the "If the referenced element has a transform [...]" sentence up above the note might help. Or append "This also applies when determining the decorated bounding box, as detailed above", or something. I'm not sure. -- Øyvind Stenhaug Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 17:37:36 UTC