- From: Andrei Bucur <abucur@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:19:43 +0100
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
I've been looking for something similar to what I imagine that exists today and I think this is it: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-html5-20080610/dom.html#htmlcollection0 The HTMLCollection has both an index getter for easy iterations and a name getter for direct access to the item. Can we extend this mechanism for the NamedFlowCollection? Andrei. On 6/21/12 11:18 PM, "Alan Stearns" <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: >On 6/21/12 8:36 AM, "Andrei Bucur" <abucur@adobe.com> wrote: > >>Hello, >> >>I've been reading the thread [1] on the public-webapps list and I was >>wondering if anyone came up with a common use case for enumerating all >>the >>NamedFlows in a Document. If not, I would like to re-propose making the >>namedFlow collection indexable by name. >>As long as there's a way (e.g. using Object.keys()) to iterate through >>the >>NamedFlow objects, I think it's more intuitive for a JS developer to see >>the collection as a map. Having both a getter function (getFlowByName()) >>and the collection attribute (namedFlows) seems confusing (questions like >>"Which one should I use?" or "What's the point of that collection?" come >>in my mind). Unifying the two APIs looks like a good option to me. >> >>Thoughts? >> >>Thanks, >>Andrei. >> >>[1] >>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/0101.html > >Andrei, > >Are you suggesting we replace the NamedFlowCollection with a NamedFlowMap >as Tab proposed? > >Or are you suggesting we change the NamedFlowCollection getter to take a >string argument instead of an index, and remove Document.getFlowByName()? > >Thanks, > >Alan >
Received on Monday, 25 June 2012 14:20:18 UTC