- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:18:25 -0700
- To: Andrei Bucur <abucur@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 6/21/12 8:36 AM, "Andrei Bucur" <abucur@adobe.com> wrote: >Hello, > >I've been reading the thread [1] on the public-webapps list and I was >wondering if anyone came up with a common use case for enumerating all the >NamedFlows in a Document. If not, I would like to re-propose making the >namedFlow collection indexable by name. >As long as there's a way (e.g. using Object.keys()) to iterate through the >NamedFlow objects, I think it's more intuitive for a JS developer to see >the collection as a map. Having both a getter function (getFlowByName()) >and the collection attribute (namedFlows) seems confusing (questions like >"Which one should I use?" or "What's the point of that collection?" come >in my mind). Unifying the two APIs looks like a good option to me. > >Thoughts? > >Thanks, >Andrei. > >[1] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/0101.html Andrei, Are you suggesting we replace the NamedFlowCollection with a NamedFlowMap as Tab proposed? Or are you suggesting we change the NamedFlowCollection getter to take a string argument instead of an index, and remove Document.getFlowByName()? Thanks, Alan
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2012 20:18:58 UTC