- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:01:19 +0000
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Currently, the specification defines how to handle the animation of properties that are only specified in some keyframes [1]: # If property is not specified for a keyframe, or is specified but invalid, # the animation of that property proceeds as if that keyframe did not exist. # Conceptually, it is as if a set of keyframes is constructed for each property # that is present in any of the keyframes, and an animation is run independently # for each property. (Yes, we're missing a 'the' at the beginning; will fix shortly) As for specifying animation-timing-function in a keyframe rule [2] : # An 'animation-timing-function' defined within a keyframe block applies to # that keyframe, otherwise the timing function specified for the animation is used. Given this, what should happen for the top and left properties in this example: @keyframes southeast { 0% { left: 100px; top: 100px; animation-timing-function: linear; } 50% { left: 200px; animation-timing-function: ease; } 100% { left: 100px; top: 200px; } } My reading of both these clauses is that top should animation from 100px to 200px using a linear timing function the entire way; left would use linear from 100px to 200px then ease from 200px back to 100px. Agree/disagree? [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-animations/#keyframes [2] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-animations/#animation-timing-function-property
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2012 00:01:52 UTC