- From: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 19:40:07 +0200
- To: WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
On 16/06/2012 17:45, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Anton Prowse<prowse@moonhenge.net> wrote: >> On 21/05/2012 22:17, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Bert Bos<bert@w3.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sunday 06 May 2012 23:17:39 fantasai wrote: >>>> >>>>> - RESOLVED: include sign in NUMBER, PERCENTAGE, DIMENSION tokens >>>>> in 2.1 >>>> >>>> >>>> I think there is an error in the minutes here (And I know I was taking >>>> minutes at that time: Sorry for confusing tokens and types. :-( ) >>>> >>>> The issue was about whether comments and spaces are allowed after the >>>> sign in property values that are defined as<number>,<length> or >>>> <percentage> >> >> >>>> So the actual edit to CSS 2.1 is easy, I think: just add that word >>>> "immediately" that css3-values already has. It goes into section 4.3.1. >>>> >>>> I'm not sure if this counts as a change or a clarification. For now, >>>> I've marked it as a change in the errata[1]. >>>> >>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/REC-CSS2-20110607- >>>> errata.html#s.4.3.1 >>> >>> >>> No, that is not what the issue was about. The resolution as recorded >>> in the minutes is correct. We want to change the definition of the >>> NUMBER, PERCENTAGE, and DIMENSION tokens so that they include the sign >>> in their production. >> >> >> Bert, Tab: this issue is filed at >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17509 >> >> It seems that we still need to agree upon a proposal, and that this issue >> should not yet be contained in the errata document. > > The proposal is to alter the "num" production to: > > num ['+'|'-']?([0-9]+|[0-9]*\.[0-9]+) > > I don't think any text needs to be altered in CSS2.1, at least not > Chapter 4, as it doesn't explicitly talk about DELIM tokens, but > rather just optional signs. You don't propose to additionally modify the production for 'term' in G.2, as suggested by Kenny? Cheers, Anton Prowse http://dev.moonhenge.net
Received on Saturday, 16 June 2012 17:40:33 UTC