- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 20:07:41 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
OK. So, if I wanted to add @regions to the inside of an @page, then that is doable, right? Image this: @region normally requires a selector to select a region, so it can style the part of the flow within the region.[1] Presumably (although the spec doesn't say) using an @region selector to select something that is not a region has no effect. But I can imagine selecting @region :root, or not having any selector at all after @region, would cause @region to just select the entire "normal" (non-named) flow (the stuff that isn't in a named region flow). Normally, doing so for continuous media wouldn't be terribly useful, but put '@region { … }' inside of '@page thisParticularPage { … }', and then the rules inside that @region would apply to only that page. I think that would about cover it, no? Can we add that to the region spec? 1) http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-regions/#the-at-region-style-rule On Jun 11, 2012, at 12:33 PM, fantasai wrote: > On 02/21/2012 12:00 AM, Brad Kemper wrote: >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On Feb 20, 2012, at 6:10 PM, Simon Sapin<simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote: >> >>> Le 21/02/2012 01:44, Simon Sapin a écrit : >>>> I first thought this was a loophole due to unforeseen interactions >>>> between the 'size' property and media queries. But if this is a feature >>>> we want, the behavior need to be spec’ed much more precisely. >>> >>> If styling elements differently on different pages is a feature, going through media queries to do it is quite contrived. I can already see authors doing this: >>> >>> @page { size: 210mm 297mm } >>> h1 { page: chapter-title } >>> /* I don’t really want to change the page size */ >>> @page chapter-title { size: 209.99mm 297mm } >>> @media print and (width: 209.99mm) { >>> p { /* Style for text on first page of the chapter */ } >>> } >>> >>> Why not go all the way and allow full element selectors in @page? >>> >>> @page { size: 210mm 297mm } >>> h1 { page: chapter-title } >>> @page chapter-title { >>> p { /* Style for text on first page of the chapter */ } >>> } >> >> Yes, this is precisely what was in mug head that I only recently realized wasn't in the spec. >> >>> The semantics would be similar to regions, but there is a syntax problem to disambiguate @page properties and type selectors. >>> >>> This is a big feature, and I wouldn’t want it to delay what is already in css3-page (especially margin boxes.) So how about this keeping full selectors for level 4? >> >> I don't see how it could be bolted on later without at least making allowances for it now. I don't think you could have 'a:link' (an element and a pseudo-class) in the same place where you could have 'color:green' (a property and value). I think the way to disambiguate would be to not have properties directly within @page, but rather have a selector to set the page box. I think :root could work, but if that is problematic, then maybe just ':page'. > > We're already stuck with the current structure of > @page { > property: value; > } > because that's in CSS2.1, and has been implemented in multiple CSS3-Page > implementations. I understand the motivation for wanting page-specific > styling of content, but I think that needs to play into the Regions > proposals; it can't affect the syntax we currently are using for @page > anyway. > > ~fantasai >
Received on Saturday, 16 June 2012 03:08:15 UTC