- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 23:17:18 -0700
- To: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Sunday 2012-07-29 16:07 +1000, Alan Gresley wrote: > On 29/07/2012 3:21 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > >This is not possible, since 'fill' is the initial value of > >'object-fit', so it must be compatible with today's behavior. And > >today's behavior (per CSS 2.1) is that given something like: > > > > <img src="..." width="1500" height="1000" style="width: 100%"> > > > >in an 800px wide container, the image will end up being 800px wide > >and 1000px tall, rather than 600px tall. > > > >If the height="1000" is omitted, then there's no knowledge of the > >intrinsic dimensions prior to the image starting (at least) to load. > > This is partly correct. It will still have an intrinsic ratio (since > width="1500" is still present). I'm just wondering if 'contain' is > what you are wanting. No, it won't, since the style="width: 100%" overrides the width="1500". -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Sunday, 29 July 2012 06:17:51 UTC