- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:25:58 -0700
- To: "Jens O. Meiert" <jens@meiert.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Jens O. Meiert <jens@meiert.com> wrote: > Could somebody share more about the estimated relevance and usefulness > of “image-orientation” [1]? > > To me it looks like the property is trying to address an issue best > solved by camera software (as well as photo editing software), and > that it hence adds unnecessary complexity for little value, but I’d > like to be proven wrong. :) The version of the property in Images 3 isn't overly useful. It's included as it documents an existing feature that CSS-based printers implemented unprefixed. Images 4 will add a "from-image" value that respects EXIF values, since browsers are forced to ignore EXIF by default, and this causes a lot of images on the web to be rotated wrongly. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2012 00:26:46 UTC