On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Divya Manian <manian@adobe.com> wrote: > On 23/07/2012 18:31, "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > >From implementer's perspective, I suspect it would be more like >> >> C > B > A >> >>I'm happy to spec anything, I just need people with informed opinions >>to inform us so the WG can make an informed decision. :) > >> The static position of the abspos item is given by a placeholder >>anonymous flex item, which impacts layout during justification >>(space-around/space-between). > > This sounds the sanest to me and what would be expected. Especially in > case of when you want to position: absolute something so you can apply css > transforms within, without impacting the layout? Did you mean the opposite? Option C *does* impact the layout. ~TJReceived on Wednesday, 25 July 2012 00:10:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:19 UTC