On 07/20/2012 06:26 AM, Anton Prowse wrote: > > In fact, the issue I was trying to address is a non-issue. I think the ED is fine as it is. Authors (and me!) will just have > to learn that 'order' is more like z-index in that it represents grouping. It doesn't represent ordinal position even in > minimal examples like the one you presented. Yep. That's why when we were debating flex-order vs flex-index, I kept arguing for flex-index. Because it works *exactly* like z-index. :) ~fantasaiReceived on Friday, 20 July 2012 15:29:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:19 UTC