- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:29:25 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 07/20/2012 06:26 AM, Anton Prowse wrote: > > In fact, the issue I was trying to address is a non-issue. I think the ED is fine as it is. Authors (and me!) will just have > to learn that 'order' is more like z-index in that it represents grouping. It doesn't represent ordinal position even in > minimal examples like the one you presented. Yep. That's why when we were debating flex-order vs flex-index, I kept arguing for flex-index. Because it works *exactly* like z-index. :) ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 20 July 2012 15:29:52 UTC