Re: [css3-flexbox] Painting order

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:29:25 -0400 Message-ID: <50097955.2050000@inkedblade.net> To: www-style@w3.org · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:50:24 UTC

On 07/20/2012 06:26 AM, Anton Prowse wrote:
>
> In fact, the issue I was trying to address is a non-issue. I think the ED is fine as it is. Authors (and me!) will just have
> to learn that 'order' is more like z-index in that it represents grouping. It doesn't represent ordinal position even in
> minimal examples like the one you presented.

Yep. That's why when we were debating flex-order vs flex-index, I kept
arguing for flex-index. Because it works *exactly* like z-index. :)

~fantasai