On Tuesday 2012-07-17 13:08 -0600, Glenn Adams wrote: > OK, the above all sounds reasonable. However, from a practical perspective, > we would need to do one of the following: > > (1) go back and add such "Canonical Order" lines to the CSS2.1 spec (via > errata); > (2) define a new spec which does only this, i.e., define Canonical Ordering > for each property; or > (3) include such normative definitions in CSSOM itself; We've already started adding Canonical Order lines to a number of modules; it's part of the module template. We don't necessarily need to do any of these immediately to address the properties that aren't yet covered; it would just mean that property serialization order for some properties isn't yet defined. But as we have the time to do the research, I think my preference would either be for (2) above or for a wiki that would eventually get included in appropriate modules once it was complete. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2012 19:41:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:17 UTC