- From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 02:28:56 +0800
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
(12/07/10 2:05), Sylvain Galineau wrote: > > [Simon Fraser:] >>> 3. An element with 'inline-block' >>> >>> and probably more. Apparently, this needs compatibility research... >>> >>> Or is there a good reason why we should start with flex items? >> >> I've seen plenty of content with z-index on things that are not >> positioned, so making changes like this will likely break content. >> > +1. Being 'aggressive' here assumes authors understand and use z-index > properly. Many do not. I am just trying to get a reason why we want to start with flex items. When I list these examples, I am thinking about treating them separately and only act if we are confident that we won't break things. Baseline: Should we do this for flex containers, too? Cheers, Kenny
Received on Monday, 9 July 2012 18:29:24 UTC