- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 07:53:44 -0700
- To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
- Cc: WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu> wrote: > (12/04/24 4:01), Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> Below are the resolutions of the issues you raised in this thread. >> >> Issue 12: cycle() and values that have commas >> Closed as OutOfScope pending WG resolution - we're proposing to punt >> cycle() to the next level so we can address these and other issues >> with cycle() more properly. > > Sorry about not spotting this earlier, but isn't toggle() back with the > same issue: > > (12/04/06 9:44), Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote: >> 1. can <value> contain ',' ? If yes, how is syntax ambiguity resolved >> within a cycle() ? > > with s/cycle/toggle/ > > The description of toggle() has a note saying > > # Note that because toggled values are separated by commas, they > # cannot themselves include top-level commas. > > Why can't we make this normative? Otherwise, you can just add a > normative statement for UA saying toggle()'s content is parsed by > splitting at commas. It's not normative because the definition falls out of the grammar if you avoid ambiguity. The note is just there as a reminder to authors. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 9 July 2012 14:54:36 UTC