- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 00:24:03 -0700
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
I think, and I suspect others agree, that the fact that z-index doesn't Just Work without 'position: relative' was a mistake in the design of CSS2. There's already a distinction between 'z-index: auto' and 'z-index: 0' that can easily distinguish a stacking context at the default level vs. a non-stacking-context at default level. The question I have is, going forward, do we want new CSS layout modes to let z-index do its job whenever it's non-'auto', without requiring 'position: relative'? (If so, we should start with making it work in flexbox.) ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 9 July 2012 07:24:30 UTC