- From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 07:31:57 +0800
- To: Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>
- CC: WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
(12/07/04 23:06), Florian Rivoal wrote: > The minutes are shorter than the actual discussion, but my recollection > was: if we were open to having bare parens do what calc do today, then > nesting bare parens would be an option. However, dropping calc in favour > of bare parens is not on the table, so nesting calc makes more sense. > > The bare parens instead of calc is an old discussion that was decided in > favour of calc a long time ago, and we are not reopening it. But the "bare parents instead of calc" idea was part of proposal 2. when the issues came up [1] (so I am not sure why it's not on the table). If the resolution is "we discussed this before" then I will appreciate a pointer to the previous discussion so we can evaluate if the rationale applies to the current situation or not. I searched "bare paren" and "bare" in www-style with no good luck so far. > At least that's the way I remember how the meeting went. Thanks for your information! [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jun/0446 Cheers, Kenny
Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2012 23:32:26 UTC