- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 14:10:46 -0700
- To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
- CC: WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
On 07/03/2012 02:04 PM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote: > (12/07/04 4:57), fantasai wrote: >> On 07/03/2012 12:47 PM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote: >>> In the current description of the specs, the default alignment of a >>> 'flex-flow: column wrap-reverse' flex container is to the start side >>> (normally left), which is the same as the side where new flex lines are >>> stacked. Is this something we want? >> >> No, it's to the cross-start side, which is the end side in a 'column >> wrap-reverse'. > > Why? > > # justify-self > # > # ... > # > # ‘auto’ > # For block-level elements, use alignment specified by the > # ‘justify-content’ property of the containing block. > > # justify-content > # > # ... > # > # ‘auto’ > # If the element has ‘display: block’ and ‘justify-self: auto’, > # computes to the value inherited from the parent. Otherwise > # computes to ‘start’. > > That seems like a 'start' to me. > > Just to be clear, I am talking about the alignment of the flex > container, not the flex lines within it. Oh. Well, in that case, the flex container is by default going to fill its containing block, so there is no alignment to consider. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2012 21:11:13 UTC