- From: Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:02:36 +0200
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:59:17 +0200, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp> wrote: > And the resolution at Hamburg actually helped, although it may not make > WD now. By that resolution, authors understood something more stable and > usable is coming soon. Implementers understood it's something worth to > spend time on. Access, a Japanese implementer, actually created a patch > and is going to upstream to Readium, and is also seeking for a > possibility to upstream WebKit too. I'm not sure if they can make it or > not, but yes, that was what I wanted, and the resolution at CSS WG > helped it to happen. So what we needed was a clear and visible statement that UTR50 was the answer. We made it, and that triggered the relevant changes in the early implementations. Good. > Now that both authors and implementers are aligned to draft #5.5 thanks > to the resolution and thanks to a lot of work to make it, and draft #6 > is in the horizon, Sylvain's proposal makes great sense to me now. I think this should be acceptable to everybody, yes. - Florian
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2012 08:03:13 UTC