- From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:02:44 +0000
- To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- CC: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
>From: Daniel Holbert [mailto:dholbert@mozilla.com] >Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 8:42 PM >To: Alex Mogilevsky > >On 01/26/2012 08:15 PM, Alex Mogilevsky wrote: >> I can't see any problems with getting 'auto' for > > alignment, so if we insist on treating that as 'inherit' > >Just to be sure we're on the same page -- we're not quite talking about >treating auto as 'inherit'. > >Rather: >* flex-item-align:inherit means "use my parent's flex-item-align value" >* flex-item-align:auto means "use my parent's flex-align value" (NOT its >flex-item-align value) > >So, unlike "inherit", "auto" queries a *different* (but related) property >on the parent. You are right. It is same cost but not exactly 'inherit'.
Received on Friday, 27 January 2012 05:03:17 UTC