On 24/1/12 20:37, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > I agree - this seems like a much friendlier way to present the list. > > ~TJ > FWIW I think there shouldn't be a list at all. It's a maintenance nightmare to have to update the spec every time a new property is defined. As long as it defines how each value type is interpolated, their combination and potential exceptions, I never got why an all inclusive list is needed. A list of a few examples, sure, but a list that has to include every CSS property?! -- Lea Verou (http://lea.verou.me | @LeaVerou)Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2012 12:19:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:10 UTC